ctfassets.net vs scribd.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| ctfassets.net | scribd.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.8M | 274.7M | scribd.com |
| Bounce Rate | 62.9% | 60.9% | scribd.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 9y 5m | 19y 11m | scribd.com |
scribd.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while ctfassets.net leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| ctfassets.net | scribd.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.8M | 274.7M | scribd.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | -1% | ctfassets.net |
| Avg. Session | 1m04s | 2m40s | scribd.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 3.1 | scribd.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
scribd.com is losing traffic (-1%) despite 274.7M monthly visits. ctfassets.net's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| ctfassets.net | scribd.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 47% | Search 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 62.9% | 60.9% | scribd.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
ctfassets.net acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while scribd.com relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ctfassets.net's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scribd.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| ctfassets.net | scribd.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 5m | 19y 11m | scribd.com |
| Registered | Mar 2017 | Sep 2006 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
scribd.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| ctfassets.net | scribd.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | — | #137 | |
| Category Rank | — | #2 |
ctfassets.net only
scribd.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: ctfassets.net could expand into India, Indonesia, Brazil, while scribd.com could target United Kingdom, Germany, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •scribd.com is losing traffic (-1%) despite 274.7M monthly visits. ctfassets.net's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •ctfassets.net acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while scribd.com relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ctfassets.net's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scribd.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •scribd.com receives 40.3x more monthly traffic than ctfassets.net (274.7M vs 6.8M).
- •ctfassets.net is growing (+5%) while scribd.com is declining (-1%).
- •scribd.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m40s avg session vs ctfassets.net's 1m04s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •ctfassets.net acquires traffic primarily through Direct (47%), while scribd.com relies on Search (69%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026