ctfassets.net vs semrush.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| ctfassets.net | semrush.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.8M | 12.9M | semrush.com |
| Bounce Rate | 62.9% | 48.8% | semrush.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 9y 5m | 17y 11m | semrush.com |
semrush.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while ctfassets.net leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| ctfassets.net | semrush.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.8M | 12.9M | semrush.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | +2% | ctfassets.net |
| Avg. Session | 1m04s | 2m46s | semrush.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 4.2 | semrush.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
semrush.com receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than ctfassets.net (12.9M vs 6.8M).
Acquisition Strategy
| ctfassets.net | semrush.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 47% | Search 50% | |
| Bounce Rate | 62.9% | 48.8% | semrush.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
ctfassets.net acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while semrush.com relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ctfassets.net's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while semrush.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| ctfassets.net | semrush.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 5m | 17y 11m | semrush.com |
| Registered | Mar 2017 | Oct 2008 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Oct 2035 |
Business Maturity · Insight
semrush.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| ctfassets.net | semrush.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | — | #4.0K | |
| Category Rank | — | #6 | |
| PH Upvotes | — | 18 |
ctfassets.net only
semrush.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: ctfassets.net could expand into India, France, while semrush.com could target Italy, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •semrush.com receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than ctfassets.net (12.9M vs 6.8M).
- •ctfassets.net acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while semrush.com relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ctfassets.net's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while semrush.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •semrush.com has 1.9x more traffic (12.9M vs 6.8M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •semrush.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m46s avg session vs ctfassets.net's 1m04s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •semrush.com has a 14 percentage point lower bounce rate (49% vs 63%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •ctfassets.net acquires traffic primarily through Direct (47%), while semrush.com relies on Search (50%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026