cursor.com vs cursor.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cursor.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 21.8M | 4.2M | cursor.com |
| Bounce Rate | 40.3% | 57.3% | cursor.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | cursor.sh |
| Domain Age | 30y 8m | 3y 5m | cursor.com |
cursor.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while cursor.sh leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| cursor.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 21.8M | 4.2M | cursor.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | -8% | cursor.com |
| Avg. Session | 4m08s | 1m37s | cursor.com |
| Pages / Visit | 4.0 | 2.4 | cursor.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cursor.com receives 5.2x more monthly traffic than cursor.sh (21.8M vs 4.2M).
Acquisition Strategy
| cursor.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Search 20% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.3% | 57.3% | cursor.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | cursor.sh |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 124%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cursor.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while cursor.sh relies on Search (20%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cursor.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cursor.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cursor.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 8m | 3y 5m | cursor.com |
| Registered | Dec 1995 | Apr 2023 | |
| Expires | Dec 2028 | Apr 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cursor.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cursor.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #2.4K | #15.6K | cursor.com |
| Category Rank | #17 | #394 | cursor.com |
| PH Upvotes | 963 | — |
cursor.com only
cursor.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cursor.com could expand into Russia, Germany, while cursor.sh could target Brazil, Singapore.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.com receives 5.2x more monthly traffic than cursor.sh (21.8M vs 4.2M).
- •cursor.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while cursor.sh relies on Search (20%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cursor.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cursor.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cursor.com receives 5.2x more monthly traffic than cursor.sh (21.8M vs 4.2M).
- •cursor.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m08s avg session vs cursor.sh's 1m37s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •cursor.com has a 17 percentage point lower bounce rate (40% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •cursor.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (62%), while cursor.sh relies on Referral (54%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026