coder.com vs cursor.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| coder.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 218.1K | 4.2M | cursor.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 43.1% | 57.3% | coder.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 34 | 35 | cursor.sh |
| Domain Age | 30y 4m | 3y 5m | coder.com |
coder.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while cursor.sh leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| coder.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 218.1K | 4.2M | cursor.sh |
| MoM Change | -6% | -8% | coder.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m37s | 1m37s | cursor.sh |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 2.4 | cursor.sh |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cursor.sh receives 19.1x more monthly traffic than coder.com (4.2M vs 218.1K).
Acquisition Strategy
| coder.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 42% | Search 20% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.1% | 57.3% | coder.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 34 | 35 | cursor.sh |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
coder.com acquires users primarily through Direct (42%), while cursor.sh relies on Search (20%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — coder.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coder.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| coder.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 4m | 3y 5m | coder.com |
| Registered | May 1996 | Apr 2023 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | Apr 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
coder.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| coder.com | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #211.5K | #15.6K | cursor.sh |
| Category Rank | #4.9K | #394 | cursor.sh |
coder.com only
cursor.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: coder.com could expand into Russia, while cursor.sh could target United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.sh receives 19.1x more monthly traffic than coder.com (4.2M vs 218.1K).
- •coder.com acquires users primarily through Direct (42%), while cursor.sh relies on Search (20%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — coder.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coder.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cursor.sh receives 19.1x more monthly traffic than coder.com (4.2M vs 218.1K).
- •cursor.sh keeps visitors significantly longer (1m37s avg session vs coder.com's 0m37s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •coder.com has a 14 percentage point lower bounce rate (43% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •coder.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (42%), while cursor.sh relies on Referral (54%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026