builder.io vs cursor.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| builder.io | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 735.2K | 4.2M | cursor.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 50.9% | 57.3% | builder.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 13y 3m | 3y 5m | builder.io |
builder.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while cursor.sh leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| builder.io | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 735.2K | 4.2M | cursor.sh |
| MoM Change | +3% | -8% | builder.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m39s | 1m37s | builder.io |
| Pages / Visit | 3.6 | 2.4 | builder.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cursor.sh is losing traffic (-8%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. builder.io's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| builder.io | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 41% | Search 20% | |
| Bounce Rate | 50.9% | 57.3% | builder.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 25%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
builder.io acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while cursor.sh relies on Search (20%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — builder.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while builder.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| builder.io | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 13y 3m | 3y 5m | builder.io |
| Registered | May 2013 | Apr 2023 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Apr 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
builder.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| builder.io | cursor.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #64.2K | #15.6K | cursor.sh |
| Category Rank | #197 | #394 | builder.io |
| PH Upvotes | 311 | — |
builder.io only
cursor.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: builder.io could expand into Russia, Germany, while cursor.sh could target United Kingdom, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.sh is losing traffic (-8%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. builder.io's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •builder.io acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while cursor.sh relies on Search (20%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — builder.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while builder.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cursor.sh receives 5.7x more monthly traffic than builder.io (4.2M vs 735.2K).
- •builder.io is growing (+3%) while cursor.sh is declining (-8%).
- •builder.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (41%), while cursor.sh relies on Referral (54%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 14 keywords (25% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026