cursor.com vs qbook.jp
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cursor.com | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 21.8M | 39.5K | cursor.com |
| Bounce Rate | 40.3% | 73.3% | cursor.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y 8m | — |
cursor.com leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while qbook.jp leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| cursor.com | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 21.8M | 39.5K | cursor.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | +24% | qbook.jp |
| Avg. Session | 4m08s | 2m59s | cursor.com |
| Pages / Visit | 4.0 | 4.1 | qbook.jp |
Growth Momentum · Insight
qbook.jp is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 1.4x shorter (2m59s vs 4m08s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| cursor.com | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Search 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.3% | 73.3% | cursor.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 100%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cursor.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while qbook.jp relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cursor.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qbook.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cursor.com | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 8m | — | |
| Registered | Dec 1995 | — | |
| Expires | Dec 2028 | — |
Market Position
| cursor.com | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #2.4K | #630.9K | cursor.com |
| Category Rank | #17 | #1.1K | cursor.com |
| PH Upvotes | 963 | — |
cursor.com only
qbook.jp only
Market Position · Insight
qbook.jp is heavily concentrated in Japan (97%), creating dependency risk on a single market. cursor.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cursor.com could expand into Japan, France, while qbook.jp could target China, India, Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 21.8M monthly visits. qbook.jp's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •qbook.jp is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 1.4x shorter (2m59s vs 4m08s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •cursor.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while qbook.jp relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cursor.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qbook.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cursor.com receives 552.5x more monthly traffic than qbook.jp (21.8M vs 39.5K).
- •qbook.jp is growing (+24%) while cursor.com is declining (-2%).
- •cursor.com has a 33 percentage point lower bounce rate (40% vs 73%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026