cursor.sh vs qbook.jp
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cursor.sh | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.2M | 39.5K | cursor.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 57.3% | 73.3% | cursor.sh |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | cursor.sh |
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | — |
cursor.sh leads in 3 of 3 dimensions, while qbook.jp leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| cursor.sh | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.2M | 39.5K | cursor.sh |
| MoM Change | -8% | +24% | qbook.jp |
| Avg. Session | 1m37s | 2m59s | qbook.jp |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 4.1 | qbook.jp |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cursor.sh is losing traffic (-8%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. qbook.jp's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| cursor.sh | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 20% | Search 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 57.3% | 73.3% | cursor.sh |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | cursor.sh |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 27%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cursor.sh acquires users primarily through Search (20%), while qbook.jp relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qbook.jp's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qbook.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cursor.sh | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | — | |
| Registered | Apr 2023 | — | |
| Expires | Apr 2026 | — |
Market Position
| cursor.sh | qbook.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #15.6K | #630.9K | cursor.sh |
| Category Rank | #394 | #1.1K | cursor.sh |
cursor.sh only
qbook.jp only
Market Position · Insight
qbook.jp is heavily concentrated in Japan (97%), creating dependency risk on a single market. cursor.sh has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cursor.sh could expand into Japan, France, while qbook.jp could target China, India, Russia.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.sh is losing traffic (-8%) despite 4.2M monthly visits. qbook.jp's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •cursor.sh acquires users primarily through Search (20%), while qbook.jp relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qbook.jp's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qbook.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cursor.sh receives 105.7x more monthly traffic than qbook.jp (4.2M vs 39.5K).
- •qbook.jp is growing (+24%) while cursor.sh is declining (-8%).
- •qbook.jp keeps visitors significantly longer (2m59s avg session vs cursor.sh's 1m37s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •cursor.sh has a 16 percentage point lower bounce rate (57% vs 73%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026