cursor.sh vs randomcoding.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cursor.sh | randomcoding.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.2M | 3.1K | cursor.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 57.3% | 36.8% | randomcoding.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | cursor.sh |
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | 18y 2m | randomcoding.com |
cursor.sh leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while randomcoding.com leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| cursor.sh | randomcoding.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.2M | 3.1K | cursor.sh |
| MoM Change | -8% | -28% | cursor.sh |
| Avg. Session | 1m37s | 0m25s | cursor.sh |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 1.7 | cursor.sh |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cursor.sh receives 1342.7x more monthly traffic than randomcoding.com (4.2M vs 3.1K).
Acquisition Strategy
| cursor.sh | randomcoding.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 20% | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 57.3% | 36.8% | randomcoding.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | cursor.sh |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%
Business Maturity
| cursor.sh | randomcoding.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 5m | 18y 2m | randomcoding.com |
| Registered | Apr 2023 | Jul 2008 | |
| Expires | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
randomcoding.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cursor.sh | randomcoding.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #15.6K | #5.6M | cursor.sh |
| Category Rank | #394 | — |
cursor.sh only
Market Position · Insight
randomcoding.com is heavily concentrated in United States (100%), creating dependency risk on a single market. cursor.sh has a more diversified audience.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.sh receives 1342.7x more monthly traffic than randomcoding.com (4.2M vs 3.1K).
- •cursor.sh receives 1342.7x more monthly traffic than randomcoding.com (4.2M vs 3.1K).
- •cursor.sh keeps visitors significantly longer (1m37s avg session vs randomcoding.com's 0m25s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •randomcoding.com has a 21 percentage point lower bounce rate (37% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 15 keywords (30% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •randomcoding.com depends on a single country for 100% of traffic, while cursor.sh is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026