dev.to vs viblo.asia
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| dev.to | viblo.asia | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.2M | 770.6K | dev.to |
| Bounce Rate | 71.8% | 59.9% | viblo.asia |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 10y 5m | 11y 5m | viblo.asia |
viblo.asia leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while dev.to leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| dev.to | viblo.asia | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.2M | 770.6K | dev.to |
| MoM Change | -13% | +18% | viblo.asia |
| Avg. Session | 1m19s | 1m12s | dev.to |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 1.8 | viblo.asia |
Growth Momentum · Insight
dev.to is losing traffic (-13%) despite 6.2M monthly visits. viblo.asia's +18% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| dev.to | viblo.asia | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 50% | Search 70% | |
| Bounce Rate | 71.8% | 59.9% | viblo.asia |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
dev.to acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while viblo.asia relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — dev.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while viblo.asia's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| dev.to | viblo.asia | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 5m | 11y 5m | viblo.asia |
| Registered | Apr 2016 | Mar 2015 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
viblo.asia has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| dev.to | viblo.asia | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #13.6K | #88.0K | dev.to |
| Category Rank | #309 | #40 | viblo.asia |
| PH Upvotes | 8 | — |
dev.to only
viblo.asia only
Market Position · Insight
viblo.asia is heavily concentrated in Vietnam (90%), creating dependency risk on a single market. dev.to has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: dev.to could expand into Vietnam, Singapore, Hong Kong SAR China, while viblo.asia could target Austria, Belgium, Czechia.
Key Takeaways
- •dev.to is losing traffic (-13%) despite 6.2M monthly visits. viblo.asia's +18% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •dev.to acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while viblo.asia relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — dev.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while viblo.asia's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •dev.to receives 8.0x more monthly traffic than viblo.asia (6.2M vs 770.6K).
- •viblo.asia is growing (+18%) while dev.to is declining (-13%).
- •viblo.asia has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (60% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •dev.to acquires traffic primarily through Direct (50%), while viblo.asia relies on Search (70%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026