dev.to vs zeabur.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| dev.to | zeabur.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.2M | 414.3K | dev.to |
| Bounce Rate | 71.8% | 34.6% | zeabur.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 10y 5m | 3y 11m | dev.to |
dev.to leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while zeabur.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| dev.to | zeabur.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.2M | 414.3K | dev.to |
| MoM Change | -13% | +4% | zeabur.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m19s | 4m05s | zeabur.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 6.8 | zeabur.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
dev.to is losing traffic (-13%) despite 6.2M monthly visits. zeabur.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| dev.to | zeabur.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 50% | Direct 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 71.8% | 34.6% | zeabur.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 33%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
dev.to acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while zeabur.com relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — zeabur.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while dev.to's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| dev.to | zeabur.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 5m | 3y 11m | dev.to |
| Registered | Apr 2016 | Sep 2022 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
dev.to has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| dev.to | zeabur.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #13.6K | #84.9K | dev.to |
| Category Rank | #309 | #133 | zeabur.com |
| PH Upvotes | 8 | — |
dev.to only
zeabur.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: dev.to could expand into Taiwan, China, Thailand, while zeabur.com could target India, Austria, Belgium.
Key Takeaways
- •dev.to is losing traffic (-13%) despite 6.2M monthly visits. zeabur.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •dev.to acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while zeabur.com relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — zeabur.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while dev.to's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •dev.to receives 14.9x more monthly traffic than zeabur.com (6.2M vs 414.3K).
- •zeabur.com is growing (+4%) while dev.to is declining (-13%).
- •zeabur.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m05s avg session vs dev.to's 1m19s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •zeabur.com has a 37 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026