espncricinfo.com vs hotstar.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| espncricinfo.com | hotstar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 76.6M | 190.1M | hotstar.com |
| Bounce Rate | 38.3% | 22.8% | hotstar.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 19y 6m | 30y 6m | hotstar.com |
hotstar.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while espncricinfo.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| espncricinfo.com | hotstar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 76.6M | 190.1M | hotstar.com |
| MoM Change | -39% | +11% | hotstar.com |
| Avg. Session | 5m51s | 7m12s | hotstar.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.0 | 4.9 | hotstar.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
espncricinfo.com is losing traffic (-39%) despite 76.6M monthly visits. hotstar.com's +11% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| espncricinfo.com | hotstar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 85% | Direct 63% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.3% | 22.8% | hotstar.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
espncricinfo.com acquires users primarily through Direct (85%), while hotstar.com relies on Direct (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — espncricinfo.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while hotstar.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| espncricinfo.com | hotstar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 19y 6m | 30y 6m | hotstar.com |
| Registered | Mar 2007 | Feb 1996 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Sep 2033 |
Business Maturity · Insight
hotstar.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| espncricinfo.com | hotstar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #827 | #217 | hotstar.com |
| Category Rank | #2 | #2 | — |
espncricinfo.com only
hotstar.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: espncricinfo.com could expand into Canada, Singapore, while hotstar.com could target Pakistan, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •espncricinfo.com is losing traffic (-39%) despite 76.6M monthly visits. hotstar.com's +11% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •espncricinfo.com acquires users primarily through Direct (85%), while hotstar.com relies on Direct (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — espncricinfo.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while hotstar.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •hotstar.com receives 2.5x more monthly traffic than espncricinfo.com (190.1M vs 76.6M).
- •hotstar.com is growing (+11%) while espncricinfo.com is declining (-39%).
- •hotstar.com has a 16 percentage point lower bounce rate (23% vs 38%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 13 keywords (28% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026