filmora.io vs wondershare.es
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| filmora.io | wondershare.es | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 134.0K | 1.3M | wondershare.es |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 56.7% | filmora.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | wondershare.es |
| Domain Age | 9y 12m | — |
wondershare.es leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while filmora.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| filmora.io | wondershare.es | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 134.0K | 1.3M | wondershare.es |
| MoM Change | -4% | -9% | filmora.io |
| Avg. Session | 0m45s | 1m16s | wondershare.es |
| Pages / Visit | 2.2 | 2.3 | wondershare.es |
Growth Momentum · Insight
wondershare.es receives 9.5x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (1.3M vs 134.0K).
Acquisition Strategy
| filmora.io | wondershare.es | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 67% | Search 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 56.7% | filmora.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | wondershare.es |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
filmora.io acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while wondershare.es relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wondershare.es's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| filmora.io | wondershare.es | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 12m | — | |
| Registered | Sep 2016 | — | |
| Expires | Sep 2027 | — |
Market Position
| filmora.io | wondershare.es | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #308.9K | #47.2K | wondershare.es |
| Category Rank | #2.2K | #15 | wondershare.es |
filmora.io only
wondershare.es only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: filmora.io could expand into Spain, Mexico, Colombia, while wondershare.es could target United States, India, Japan.
Key Takeaways
- •wondershare.es receives 9.5x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (1.3M vs 134.0K).
- •filmora.io acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while wondershare.es relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wondershare.es's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •wondershare.es receives 9.5x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (1.3M vs 134.0K).
- •wondershare.es keeps visitors significantly longer (1m16s avg session vs filmora.io's 0m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •filmora.io has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (37% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •filmora.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (67%), while wondershare.es relies on Search (62%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026