filmora.io vs wondershare.net
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| filmora.io | wondershare.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 134.0K | 3.1M | wondershare.net |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 53.9% | filmora.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | wondershare.net |
| Domain Age | 9y 12m | 19y 10m | wondershare.net |
wondershare.net leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while filmora.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| filmora.io | wondershare.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 134.0K | 3.1M | wondershare.net |
| MoM Change | -4% | +4% | wondershare.net |
| Avg. Session | 0m45s | 2m21s | wondershare.net |
| Pages / Visit | 2.2 | 2.2 | filmora.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
filmora.io is losing traffic (-4%) despite 134.0K monthly visits. wondershare.net's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| filmora.io | wondershare.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 67% | Search 82% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 53.9% | filmora.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | wondershare.net |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
filmora.io acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while wondershare.net relies on Search (82%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wondershare.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| filmora.io | wondershare.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 12m | 19y 10m | wondershare.net |
| Registered | Sep 2016 | Oct 2006 | |
| Expires | Sep 2027 | Oct 2030 |
Business Maturity · Insight
wondershare.net has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| filmora.io | wondershare.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #308.9K | #21.5K | wondershare.net |
| Category Rank | #2.2K | #307 | wondershare.net |
filmora.io only
wondershare.net only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: filmora.io could expand into Brazil, Mexico, Italy, while wondershare.net could target Japan, Peru, France.
Key Takeaways
- •filmora.io is losing traffic (-4%) despite 134.0K monthly visits. wondershare.net's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •filmora.io acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while wondershare.net relies on Search (82%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wondershare.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •wondershare.net receives 23.3x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (3.1M vs 134.0K).
- •wondershare.net is growing (+4%) while filmora.io is declining (-4%).
- •wondershare.net keeps visitors significantly longer (2m21s avg session vs filmora.io's 0m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •filmora.io has a 16 percentage point lower bounce rate (37% vs 54%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026