github.io vs monoskop.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| github.io | monoskop.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 16.1K | 1.1M | monoskop.org |
| Bounce Rate | 47.5% | 60.2% | github.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | github.io |
| Domain Age | 13y 6m | 14y 8m | monoskop.org |
github.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while monoskop.org leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| github.io | monoskop.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 16.1K | 1.1M | monoskop.org |
| MoM Change | -10% | -6% | monoskop.org |
| Avg. Session | 0m25s | 0m50s | monoskop.org |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 1.9 | monoskop.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
monoskop.org receives 65.4x more monthly traffic than github.io (1.1M vs 16.1K).
Acquisition Strategy
| github.io | monoskop.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | — | Search 71% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.5% | 60.2% | github.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | github.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | github.io | monoskop.org |
|---|---|---|---|
| annas archive | 1.7M | #1 | #4 |
| libgen | 1.5M | #3 | #9 |
| anna's archive | 882.3K | #1 | #6 |
| library genesis | 418.0K | #2 | #5 |
| annas archives | 58.5K | #2 | #5 |
| lib genesis | 11.9K | #2 | #5 |
| library gensis | 5.9K | #2 | #5 |
Business Maturity
| github.io | monoskop.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 13y 6m | 14y 8m | monoskop.org |
| Registered | Mar 2013 | Dec 2011 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Dec 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
monoskop.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| github.io | monoskop.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.6M | #61.3K | monoskop.org |
| Category Rank | #7.5K | #12 | monoskop.org |
| PH Upvotes | 417 | — |
github.io only
monoskop.org only
Market Position · Insight
github.io is heavily concentrated in United States (50%), creating dependency risk on a single market. monoskop.org has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: github.io could expand into United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, while monoskop.org could target India, Poland, Egypt.
Key Takeaways
- •monoskop.org receives 65.4x more monthly traffic than github.io (1.1M vs 16.1K).
- •monoskop.org receives 65.4x more monthly traffic than github.io (1.1M vs 16.1K).
- •monoskop.org keeps visitors significantly longer (0m50s avg session vs github.io's 0m25s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •github.io has a 13 percentage point lower bounce rate (48% vs 60%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •github.io depends on a single country for 50% of traffic, while monoskop.org is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026