independent.co.uk vs time.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| independent.co.uk | time.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 65.6M | 13.1M | independent.co.uk |
| Bounce Rate | 58.9% | 69.8% | independent.co.uk |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | — | 32y 9m |
independent.co.uk leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while time.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| independent.co.uk | time.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 65.6M | 13.1M | independent.co.uk |
| MoM Change | +9% | +19% | time.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m08s | 1m04s | independent.co.uk |
| Pages / Visit | 2.0 | 1.5 | independent.co.uk |
Growth Momentum · Insight
time.com is growing faster (+19%) but visitors stay 2.0x shorter (1m04s vs 2m08s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| independent.co.uk | time.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 49% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 58.9% | 69.8% | independent.co.uk |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 3%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
independent.co.uk acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while time.com relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — independent.co.uk's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while time.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| independent.co.uk | time.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 32y 9m | |
| Registered | — | Nov 1993 | |
| Expires | — | Nov 2026 |
Market Position
| independent.co.uk | time.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #949 | #6.3K | independent.co.uk |
| Category Rank | #9 | #102 | independent.co.uk |
independent.co.uk only
time.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: independent.co.uk could expand into India, while time.com could target Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •time.com is growing +19% while independent.co.uk grows +9%. At current trajectory, time.com could close the traffic gap within 15 months.
- •time.com is growing faster (+19%) but visitors stay 2.0x shorter (1m04s vs 2m08s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •independent.co.uk acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while time.com relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — independent.co.uk's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while time.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •independent.co.uk receives 5.0x more monthly traffic than time.com (65.6M vs 13.1M).
- •Both are growing, with time.com accelerating faster at +19% vs +9%.
- •independent.co.uk keeps visitors significantly longer (2m08s avg session vs time.com's 1m04s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026