sciencedirect.com vs sciencefocus.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| sciencedirect.com | sciencefocus.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 73.7M | 1.9M | sciencedirect.com |
| Bounce Rate | 33.1% | 62.4% | sciencedirect.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 29y 5m | 26y 6m | sciencedirect.com |
sciencedirect.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while sciencefocus.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| sciencedirect.com | sciencefocus.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 73.7M | 1.9M | sciencedirect.com |
| MoM Change | -3% | -2% | sciencefocus.com |
| Avg. Session | 8m34s | 0m59s | sciencedirect.com |
| Pages / Visit | 6.9 | 1.5 | sciencedirect.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sciencedirect.com receives 38.2x more monthly traffic than sciencefocus.com (73.7M vs 1.9M).
Acquisition Strategy
| sciencedirect.com | sciencefocus.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 44% | Search 50% | |
| Bounce Rate | 33.1% | 62.4% | sciencedirect.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
sciencedirect.com acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while sciencefocus.com relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sciencedirect.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sciencefocus.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| sciencedirect.com | sciencefocus.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 29y 5m | 26y 6m | sciencedirect.com |
| Registered | Mar 1997 | Mar 2000 | |
| Expires | Mar 2031 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
sciencedirect.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| sciencedirect.com | sciencefocus.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #416 | #38.7K | sciencedirect.com |
| Category Rank | #4 | #383 | sciencedirect.com |
sciencedirect.com only
sciencefocus.com only
Market Position · Insight
sciencefocus.com is heavily concentrated in United States (42%), creating dependency risk on a single market. sciencedirect.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: sciencedirect.com could expand into Canada, Australia, while sciencefocus.com could target China, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •sciencedirect.com receives 38.2x more monthly traffic than sciencefocus.com (73.7M vs 1.9M).
- •sciencedirect.com acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while sciencefocus.com relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sciencedirect.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sciencefocus.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sciencedirect.com receives 38.2x more monthly traffic than sciencefocus.com (73.7M vs 1.9M).
- •sciencedirect.com keeps visitors significantly longer (8m34s avg session vs sciencefocus.com's 0m59s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •sciencedirect.com has a 29 percentage point lower bounce rate (33% vs 62%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026