sofascore.com vs vidio.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| sofascore.com | vidio.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 94.0M | 8.9M | sofascore.com |
| Bounce Rate | 51.5% | 42.1% | vidio.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 14y 3m | 28y 9m | vidio.com |
vidio.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while sofascore.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| sofascore.com | vidio.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 94.0M | 8.9M | sofascore.com |
| MoM Change | -13% | -21% | sofascore.com |
| Avg. Session | 5m13s | 4m06s | sofascore.com |
| Pages / Visit | 4.3 | 3.7 | sofascore.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sofascore.com receives 10.5x more monthly traffic than vidio.com (94.0M vs 8.9M).
Acquisition Strategy
| sofascore.com | vidio.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 54% | Direct 55% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.5% | 42.1% | vidio.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 9%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
sofascore.com acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while vidio.com relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — vidio.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while vidio.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| sofascore.com | vidio.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 14y 3m | 28y 9m | vidio.com |
| Registered | May 2012 | Nov 1997 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | Aug 2030 |
Business Maturity · Insight
vidio.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| sofascore.com | vidio.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #528 | #6.8K | sofascore.com |
| Category Rank | #5 | #9 | sofascore.com |
sofascore.com only
vidio.com only
Market Position · Insight
vidio.com is heavily concentrated in Indonesia (94%), creating dependency risk on a single market. sofascore.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: sofascore.com could expand into Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, while vidio.com could target Brazil, United Kingdom, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •sofascore.com receives 10.5x more monthly traffic than vidio.com (94.0M vs 8.9M).
- •sofascore.com acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while vidio.com relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — vidio.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while vidio.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sofascore.com receives 10.5x more monthly traffic than vidio.com (94.0M vs 8.9M).
- •vidio.com has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (42% vs 51%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 9% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •vidio.com depends on a single country for 94% of traffic, while sofascore.com is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026