sostav.ru vs t-j.ru
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| sostav.ru | t-j.ru | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.8M | 29.6M | t-j.ru |
| Bounce Rate | 62.5% | 49.8% | t-j.ru |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
t-j.ru leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while sostav.ru leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| sostav.ru | t-j.ru | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.8M | 29.6M | t-j.ru |
| MoM Change | -9% | -2% | t-j.ru |
| Avg. Session | 0m45s | 3m57s | t-j.ru |
| Pages / Visit | 1.4 | 2.2 | t-j.ru |
Growth Momentum · Insight
t-j.ru receives 16.1x more monthly traffic than sostav.ru (29.6M vs 1.8M).
Acquisition Strategy
| sostav.ru | t-j.ru | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 49% | Search 55% | |
| Bounce Rate | 62.5% | 49.8% | t-j.ru |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
| Keyword | Volume | sostav.ru | t-j.ru |
|---|---|---|---|
| оживить фото бесплатно | 4.7K | #9 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
sostav.ru acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while t-j.ru relies on Search (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sostav.ru's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while t-j.ru's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Market Position
| sostav.ru | t-j.ru | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #43.0K | #2.2K | t-j.ru |
| Category Rank | #12 | #8 | t-j.ru |
sostav.ru only
t-j.ru only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: sostav.ru could expand into Netherlands, while t-j.ru could target Kazakhstan.
Key Takeaways
- •t-j.ru receives 16.1x more monthly traffic than sostav.ru (29.6M vs 1.8M).
- •sostav.ru acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while t-j.ru relies on Search (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sostav.ru's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while t-j.ru's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •t-j.ru receives 16.1x more monthly traffic than sostav.ru (29.6M vs 1.8M).
- •t-j.ru keeps visitors significantly longer (3m57s avg session vs sostav.ru's 0m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •t-j.ru has a 13 percentage point lower bounce rate (50% vs 62%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 10 keywords (20% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026