tgstat.com vs urlscan.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| tgstat.com | urlscan.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 17.0M | 1.2M | tgstat.com |
| Bounce Rate | 38.9% | 37.4% | urlscan.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 9y 2m | 10y 6m | urlscan.io |
urlscan.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while tgstat.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| tgstat.com | urlscan.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 17.0M | 1.2M | tgstat.com |
| MoM Change | -7% | +1% | urlscan.io |
| Avg. Session | 13m08s | 1m44s | tgstat.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.5 | 4.4 | urlscan.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
tgstat.com is losing traffic (-7%) despite 17.0M monthly visits. urlscan.io's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| tgstat.com | urlscan.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 59% | Direct 56% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.9% | 37.4% | urlscan.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
tgstat.com acquires users primarily through Search (59%), while urlscan.io relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — urlscan.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tgstat.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| tgstat.com | urlscan.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 2m | 10y 6m | urlscan.io |
| Registered | Jul 2017 | Feb 2016 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Feb 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
urlscan.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| tgstat.com | urlscan.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #3.1K | #38.0K | tgstat.com |
| Category Rank | #42 | — |
tgstat.com only
urlscan.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: tgstat.com could expand into Germany, Brazil, Vietnam, while urlscan.io could target Russia, Ukraine, Taiwan.
Key Takeaways
- •tgstat.com is losing traffic (-7%) despite 17.0M monthly visits. urlscan.io's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •tgstat.com acquires users primarily through Search (59%), while urlscan.io relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — urlscan.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tgstat.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •tgstat.com receives 14.4x more monthly traffic than urlscan.io (17.0M vs 1.2M).
- •urlscan.io is growing (+1%) while tgstat.com is declining (-7%).
- •tgstat.com keeps visitors significantly longer (13m08s avg session vs urlscan.io's 1m44s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •tgstat.com acquires traffic primarily through Search (59%), while urlscan.io relies on Direct (56%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026