urlscan.io vs whoisfreaks.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| urlscan.io | whoisfreaks.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 283.9K | urlscan.io |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 41.1% | urlscan.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 10y 6m | 7y 5m | urlscan.io |
urlscan.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while whoisfreaks.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| urlscan.io | whoisfreaks.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 283.9K | urlscan.io |
| MoM Change | +1% | +0% | urlscan.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m44s | 0m31s | urlscan.io |
| Pages / Visit | 4.4 | 2.0 | urlscan.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
urlscan.io receives 4.1x more monthly traffic than whoisfreaks.com (1.2M vs 283.9K).
Acquisition Strategy
| urlscan.io | whoisfreaks.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 56% | Search 66% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 41.1% | urlscan.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
urlscan.io acquires users primarily through Direct (56%), while whoisfreaks.com relies on Search (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — urlscan.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while whoisfreaks.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| urlscan.io | whoisfreaks.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 6m | 7y 5m | urlscan.io |
| Registered | Feb 2016 | Mar 2019 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
urlscan.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| urlscan.io | whoisfreaks.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #38.0K | #173.2K | urlscan.io |
| Category Rank | — | #450 |
urlscan.io only
whoisfreaks.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: urlscan.io could expand into Italy, South Korea, while whoisfreaks.com could target Brazil, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •urlscan.io receives 4.1x more monthly traffic than whoisfreaks.com (1.2M vs 283.9K).
- •urlscan.io acquires users primarily through Direct (56%), while whoisfreaks.com relies on Search (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — urlscan.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while whoisfreaks.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •urlscan.io receives 4.1x more monthly traffic than whoisfreaks.com (1.2M vs 283.9K).
- •urlscan.io keeps visitors significantly longer (1m44s avg session vs whoisfreaks.com's 0m31s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •urlscan.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (56%), while whoisfreaks.com relies on Search (66%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026