verisign.com vs whois.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| verisign.com | whois.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 240.0K | 3.8M | whois.com |
| Bounce Rate | 44.0% | 34.7% | whois.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 31y 3m | 31y 4m | whois.com |
whois.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while verisign.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| verisign.com | whois.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 240.0K | 3.8M | whois.com |
| MoM Change | +10% | +3% | verisign.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m34s | 2m38s | whois.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 3.0 | whois.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
whois.com receives 15.9x more monthly traffic than verisign.com (3.8M vs 240.0K).
Acquisition Strategy
| verisign.com | whois.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 47% | Direct 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.0% | 34.7% | whois.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | verisign.com | whois.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain whois | 36.1K | #8 | #1 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
verisign.com acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while whois.com relies on Direct (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — whois.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while whois.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| verisign.com | whois.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 3m | 31y 4m | whois.com |
| Registered | Jun 1995 | Apr 1995 | |
| Expires | May 2034 | Apr 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
whois.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| verisign.com | whois.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #216.1K | #15.9K | whois.com |
| Category Rank | #473 | #43 | whois.com |
verisign.com only
whois.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: verisign.com could expand into Brazil, Germany, Pakistan, while whois.com could target Japan, France, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •whois.com receives 15.9x more monthly traffic than verisign.com (3.8M vs 240.0K).
- •verisign.com acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while whois.com relies on Direct (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — whois.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while whois.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •whois.com receives 15.9x more monthly traffic than verisign.com (3.8M vs 240.0K).
- •Both are growing, with verisign.com accelerating faster at +10% vs +3%.
- •whois.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m38s avg session vs verisign.com's 0m34s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •whois.com has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 44%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026