arkansas.gov vs ca.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| arkansas.gov | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.4M | 88.0M | ca.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 34.0% | ca.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 26y 1m | 28y 11m | ca.gov |
ca.gov leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while arkansas.gov leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| arkansas.gov | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.4M | 88.0M | ca.gov |
| MoM Change | -3% | +5% | ca.gov |
| Avg. Session | 5m20s | 6m58s | ca.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 6.1 | 7.5 | ca.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
arkansas.gov is losing traffic (-3%) despite 3.4M monthly visits. ca.gov's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| arkansas.gov | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 55% | Direct 44% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 34.0% | ca.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
arkansas.gov acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while ca.gov relies on Direct (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arkansas.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ca.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| arkansas.gov | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 26y 1m | 28y 11m | ca.gov |
| Registered | Jul 2000 | Oct 1997 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
ca.gov has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| arkansas.gov | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #13.0K | #326 | ca.gov |
| Category Rank | #69 | #1 | ca.gov |
arkansas.gov only
ca.gov only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: arkansas.gov could expand into Philippines, Mexico, while ca.gov could target United Kingdom, Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •arkansas.gov is losing traffic (-3%) despite 3.4M monthly visits. ca.gov's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •arkansas.gov acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while ca.gov relies on Direct (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arkansas.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ca.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ca.gov receives 25.8x more monthly traffic than arkansas.gov (88.0M vs 3.4M).
- •ca.gov is growing (+5%) while arkansas.gov is declining (-3%).
- •They share 10 keywords (20% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026