bmj.com vs statnews.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| bmj.com | statnews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.7M | 2.1M | bmj.com |
| Bounce Rate | 49.2% | 63.8% | bmj.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 31y 6m | 23y 2m | bmj.com |
bmj.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while statnews.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| bmj.com | statnews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.7M | 2.1M | bmj.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | +6% | statnews.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m60s | 1m08s | bmj.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 1.6 | bmj.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
bmj.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 4.7M monthly visits. statnews.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| bmj.com | statnews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 45% | Direct 41% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.2% | 63.8% | bmj.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
bmj.com acquires users primarily through Search (45%), while statnews.com relies on Direct (41%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — statnews.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while bmj.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| bmj.com | statnews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 6m | 23y 2m | bmj.com |
| Registered | Feb 1995 | Jun 2003 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
bmj.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| bmj.com | statnews.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #13.9K | #34.6K | bmj.com |
| Category Rank | #136 | #213 | bmj.com |
bmj.com only
statnews.com only
Market Position · Insight
statnews.com is heavily concentrated in United States (79%), creating dependency risk on a single market. bmj.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: bmj.com could expand into Switzerland, while statnews.com could target Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •bmj.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 4.7M monthly visits. statnews.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •bmj.com acquires users primarily through Search (45%), while statnews.com relies on Direct (41%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — statnews.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while bmj.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •bmj.com receives 2.2x more monthly traffic than statnews.com (4.7M vs 2.1M).
- •statnews.com is growing (+6%) while bmj.com is declining (-2%).
- •bmj.com keeps visitors significantly longer (1m60s avg session vs statnews.com's 1m08s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •bmj.com has a 15 percentage point lower bounce rate (49% vs 64%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026