builder.io vs coder.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| builder.io | coder.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 735.2K | 218.1K | builder.io |
| Bounce Rate | 50.9% | 43.1% | coder.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 34 | builder.io |
| Domain Age | 13y 3m | 30y 4m | coder.com |
builder.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while coder.com leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| builder.io | coder.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 735.2K | 218.1K | builder.io |
| MoM Change | +3% | -6% | builder.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m39s | 0m37s | builder.io |
| Pages / Visit | 3.6 | 2.1 | builder.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
coder.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 218.1K monthly visits. builder.io's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| builder.io | coder.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 41% | Direct 42% | |
| Bounce Rate | 50.9% | 43.1% | coder.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 34 | builder.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
builder.io acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while coder.com relies on Direct (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — coder.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coder.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| builder.io | coder.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 13y 3m | 30y 4m | coder.com |
| Registered | May 2013 | May 1996 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | May 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
coder.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| builder.io | coder.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #64.2K | #211.5K | builder.io |
| Category Rank | #197 | #4.9K | builder.io |
| PH Upvotes | 311 | — |
builder.io only
coder.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: builder.io could expand into Germany, while coder.com could target Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •coder.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 218.1K monthly visits. builder.io's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •builder.io acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while coder.com relies on Direct (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — coder.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coder.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •builder.io receives 3.4x more monthly traffic than coder.com (735.2K vs 218.1K).
- •builder.io is growing (+3%) while coder.com is declining (-6%).
- •builder.io keeps visitors significantly longer (1m39s avg session vs coder.com's 0m37s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 15 keywords (28% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026