coder.com vs cursor.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| coder.com | cursor.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 218.1K | 21.8M | cursor.com |
| Bounce Rate | 43.1% | 40.3% | cursor.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 34 | 30 | coder.com |
| Domain Age | 30y 4m | 30y 8m | cursor.com |
cursor.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while coder.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| coder.com | cursor.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 218.1K | 21.8M | cursor.com |
| MoM Change | -6% | -2% | cursor.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m37s | 4m08s | cursor.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 4.0 | cursor.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cursor.com receives 100.0x more monthly traffic than coder.com (21.8M vs 218.1K).
Acquisition Strategy
| coder.com | cursor.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 42% | Direct 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.1% | 40.3% | cursor.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 34 | 30 | coder.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 129%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
coder.com acquires users primarily through Direct (42%), while cursor.com relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cursor.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coder.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| coder.com | cursor.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 4m | 30y 8m | cursor.com |
| Registered | May 1996 | Dec 1995 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | Dec 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cursor.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| coder.com | cursor.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #211.5K | #2.4K | cursor.com |
| Category Rank | #4.9K | #17 | cursor.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 963 |
coder.com only
cursor.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: coder.com could expand into Brazil, Singapore, while cursor.com could target Germany, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •cursor.com receives 100.0x more monthly traffic than coder.com (21.8M vs 218.1K).
- •coder.com acquires users primarily through Direct (42%), while cursor.com relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cursor.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coder.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cursor.com receives 100.0x more monthly traffic than coder.com (21.8M vs 218.1K).
- •cursor.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m08s avg session vs coder.com's 0m37s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 36 keywords (129% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026