cancer.org vs mayoclinic.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cancer.org | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.3M | 53.0M | mayoclinic.org |
| Bounce Rate | 64.6% | 77.4% | cancer.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 31y 11m | 29y 6m | cancer.org |
cancer.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while mayoclinic.org leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| cancer.org | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.3M | 53.0M | mayoclinic.org |
| MoM Change | +15% | +3% | cancer.org |
| Avg. Session | 1m10s | 1m05s | cancer.org |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 1.6 | cancer.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
mayoclinic.org receives 22.7x more monthly traffic than cancer.org (53.0M vs 2.3M).
Acquisition Strategy
| cancer.org | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 61% | Search 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 64.6% | 77.4% | cancer.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | cancer.org | mayoclinic.org |
|---|---|---|---|
| calorie tracker | 19.1K | #8 | #7 |
| calorie tracker online | 1.2K | #9 | #4 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cancer.org acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while mayoclinic.org relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cancer.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mayoclinic.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cancer.org | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 11m | 29y 6m | cancer.org |
| Registered | Oct 1994 | Feb 1997 | |
| Expires | Oct 2029 | Feb 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cancer.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cancer.org | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #30.6K | #1.3K | mayoclinic.org |
| Category Rank | #12 | #3 | mayoclinic.org |
cancer.org only
mayoclinic.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cancer.org could expand into United Kingdom, Australia, while mayoclinic.org could target Mexico, Spain.
Key Takeaways
- •mayoclinic.org receives 22.7x more monthly traffic than cancer.org (53.0M vs 2.3M).
- •cancer.org acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while mayoclinic.org relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cancer.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mayoclinic.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •mayoclinic.org receives 22.7x more monthly traffic than cancer.org (53.0M vs 2.3M).
- •Both are growing, with cancer.org accelerating faster at +15% vs +3%.
- •cancer.org has a 13 percentage point lower bounce rate (65% vs 77%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026