mayoclinic.org vs who.int
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| mayoclinic.org | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 53.0M | 9.9M | mayoclinic.org |
| Bounce Rate | 77.4% | 58.3% | who.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 29y 6m | 28y 3m | mayoclinic.org |
mayoclinic.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while who.int leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| mayoclinic.org | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 53.0M | 9.9M | mayoclinic.org |
| MoM Change | +3% | -7% | mayoclinic.org |
| Avg. Session | 1m05s | 2m23s | who.int |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 2.8 | who.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
mayoclinic.org is growing faster (+3%) but visitors stay 2.2x shorter (1m05s vs 2m23s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| mayoclinic.org | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 74% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 77.4% | 58.3% | who.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 18%
| Keyword | Volume | mayoclinic.org | who.int |
|---|---|---|---|
| esquizofrenia | 39.3K | #1 | #4 |
| what are the | 6.6K | #1 | #4 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
mayoclinic.org acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — who.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mayoclinic.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| mayoclinic.org | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 29y 6m | 28y 3m | mayoclinic.org |
| Registered | Feb 1997 | Jun 1998 | |
| Expires | Feb 2028 | — |
Business Maturity · Insight
mayoclinic.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| mayoclinic.org | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.3K | #6.5K | mayoclinic.org |
| Category Rank | #3 | #184 | mayoclinic.org |
mayoclinic.org only
who.int only
Market Position · Insight
mayoclinic.org is heavily concentrated in United States (68%), creating dependency risk on a single market. who.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: mayoclinic.org could expand into Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, while who.int could target Canada, United Kingdom, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •who.int is losing traffic (-7%) despite 9.9M monthly visits. mayoclinic.org's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •mayoclinic.org is growing faster (+3%) but visitors stay 2.2x shorter (1m05s vs 2m23s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •mayoclinic.org acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — who.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mayoclinic.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •mayoclinic.org receives 5.4x more monthly traffic than who.int (53.0M vs 9.9M).
- •mayoclinic.org is growing (+3%) while who.int is declining (-7%).
- •who.int keeps visitors significantly longer (2m23s avg session vs mayoclinic.org's 1m05s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026