jamanetwork.com vs mayoclinic.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| jamanetwork.com | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.3M | 53.0M | mayoclinic.org |
| Bounce Rate | 47.4% | 77.4% | jamanetwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 19y 3m | 29y 6m | mayoclinic.org |
mayoclinic.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while jamanetwork.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| jamanetwork.com | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.3M | 53.0M | mayoclinic.org |
| MoM Change | +1% | +3% | mayoclinic.org |
| Avg. Session | 2m09s | 1m05s | jamanetwork.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.7 | 1.6 | jamanetwork.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
mayoclinic.org receives 12.2x more monthly traffic than jamanetwork.com (53.0M vs 4.3M).
Acquisition Strategy
| jamanetwork.com | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 35% | Search 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.4% | 77.4% | jamanetwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 58%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
jamanetwork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (35%), while mayoclinic.org relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — jamanetwork.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mayoclinic.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| jamanetwork.com | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 19y 3m | 29y 6m | mayoclinic.org |
| Registered | Jun 2007 | Feb 1997 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Feb 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
mayoclinic.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| jamanetwork.com | mayoclinic.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #14.7K | #1.3K | mayoclinic.org |
| Category Rank | #67 | #3 | mayoclinic.org |
jamanetwork.com only
mayoclinic.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: jamanetwork.com could expand into Australia, while mayoclinic.org could target Japan.
Key Takeaways
- •mayoclinic.org receives 12.2x more monthly traffic than jamanetwork.com (53.0M vs 4.3M).
- •jamanetwork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (35%), while mayoclinic.org relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — jamanetwork.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mayoclinic.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •mayoclinic.org receives 12.2x more monthly traffic than jamanetwork.com (53.0M vs 4.3M).
- •jamanetwork.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m09s avg session vs mayoclinic.org's 1m05s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •jamanetwork.com has a 30 percentage point lower bounce rate (47% vs 77%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •jamanetwork.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (35%), while mayoclinic.org relies on Search (74%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026