cfr.org vs csis.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cfr.org | csis.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.7M | 1.2M | cfr.org |
| Bounce Rate | 59.8% | 58.9% | csis.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 33y 2m | 31y 2m | cfr.org |
cfr.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while csis.org leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| cfr.org | csis.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.7M | 1.2M | cfr.org |
| MoM Change | -6% | +5% | csis.org |
| Avg. Session | 0m55s | 1m07s | csis.org |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 1.9 | csis.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cfr.org is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.7M monthly visits. csis.org's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| cfr.org | csis.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 54% | Search 55% | |
| Bounce Rate | 59.8% | 58.9% | csis.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 161%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cfr.org acquires users primarily through Search (54%), while csis.org relies on Search (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cfr.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while csis.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cfr.org | csis.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 33y 2m | 31y 2m | cfr.org |
| Registered | Jul 1993 | Jun 1995 | |
| Expires | Jul 2028 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cfr.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cfr.org | csis.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #41.2K | #55.0K | cfr.org |
| Category Rank | #352 | #506 | cfr.org |
cfr.org only
csis.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cfr.org could expand into Germany, while csis.org could target Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •cfr.org is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.7M monthly visits. csis.org's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •cfr.org acquires users primarily through Search (54%), while csis.org relies on Search (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cfr.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while csis.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cfr.org has 1.5x more traffic (1.7M vs 1.2M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •csis.org is growing (+5%) while cfr.org is declining (-6%).
- •They share 37 keywords (161% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026