congress.gov vs house.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| congress.gov | house.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.1M | 6.7M | house.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 47.9% | 59.1% | congress.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | 28y 11m | congress.gov |
congress.gov leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while house.gov leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| congress.gov | house.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.1M | 6.7M | house.gov |
| MoM Change | +12% | +14% | house.gov |
| Avg. Session | 4m02s | 2m08s | congress.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 4.2 | 2.5 | congress.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
house.gov receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than congress.gov (6.7M vs 5.1M).
Acquisition Strategy
| congress.gov | house.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 63% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.9% | 59.1% | congress.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 36%
| Keyword | Volume | congress.gov | house.gov |
|---|---|---|---|
| nancy mace | 263.8K | #5 | #1 |
| oversight | 44.6K | #10 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
congress.gov acquires users primarily through Search (63%), while house.gov relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — house.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while congress.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| congress.gov | house.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | 28y 11m | congress.gov |
| Registered | Oct 1997 | Oct 1997 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
congress.gov has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| congress.gov | house.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #10.0K | #9.9K | house.gov |
| Category Rank | #57 | #50 | house.gov |
congress.gov only
house.gov only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: congress.gov could expand into Australia, while house.gov could target Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •house.gov receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than congress.gov (6.7M vs 5.1M).
- •congress.gov acquires users primarily through Search (63%), while house.gov relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — house.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while congress.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •house.gov has 1.3x more traffic (6.7M vs 5.1M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •congress.gov keeps visitors significantly longer (4m02s avg session vs house.gov's 2m08s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •congress.gov has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (48% vs 59%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 16 keywords (36% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026