house.gov vs justice.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| house.gov | justice.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.7M | 10.2M | justice.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 59.1% | 52.3% | justice.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | 28y 3m | house.gov |
justice.gov leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while house.gov leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| house.gov | justice.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.7M | 10.2M | justice.gov |
| MoM Change | +14% | +0% | house.gov |
| Avg. Session | 2m08s | 3m29s | justice.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 2.5 | 4.0 | justice.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
house.gov is growing faster (+14%) but visitors stay 1.6x shorter (2m08s vs 3m29s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| house.gov | justice.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 53% | Search 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 59.1% | 52.3% | justice.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 186%
| Keyword | Volume | house.gov | justice.gov |
|---|---|---|---|
| jeffrey epstein | 6.5M | #5 | #9 |
| unredacted epstein files | 30.0K | #2 | #6 |
| epstein files unredacted | 16.4K | #6 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
house.gov acquires users primarily through Search (53%), while justice.gov relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — justice.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while house.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| house.gov | justice.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | 28y 3m | house.gov |
| Registered | Oct 1997 | May 1998 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
house.gov has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| house.gov | justice.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #9.9K | #5.2K | justice.gov |
| Category Rank | #50 | #3 | justice.gov |
house.gov only
justice.gov only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: house.gov could expand into Mexico, Dominican Republic, while justice.gov could target United Kingdom, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •justice.gov receives 1.5x more monthly traffic than house.gov (10.2M vs 6.7M).
- •house.gov is growing faster (+14%) but visitors stay 1.6x shorter (2m08s vs 3m29s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •house.gov acquires users primarily through Search (53%), while justice.gov relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — justice.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while house.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •justice.gov has 1.5x more traffic (10.2M vs 6.7M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •justice.gov keeps visitors significantly longer (3m29s avg session vs house.gov's 2m08s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 39 keywords (186% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026