esa.int vs livescience.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| esa.int | livescience.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 8.2M | livescience.com |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 59.5% | esa.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y | 25y 5m | esa.int |
esa.int leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while livescience.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| esa.int | livescience.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 8.2M | livescience.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | -11% | esa.int |
| Avg. Session | 2m18s | 1m05s | esa.int |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 1.5 | esa.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
livescience.com is losing traffic (-11%) despite 8.2M monthly visits. esa.int's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| esa.int | livescience.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 43% | Direct 37% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 59.5% | esa.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 13%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while livescience.com relies on Direct (37%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — esa.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while esa.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| esa.int | livescience.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y | 25y 5m | esa.int |
| Registered | Aug 1996 | Apr 2001 | |
| Expires | — | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
esa.int has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| esa.int | livescience.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25.5K | #10.1K | livescience.com |
| Category Rank | #75 | #8 | livescience.com |
esa.int only
livescience.com only
Market Position · Insight
livescience.com is heavily concentrated in United States (63%), creating dependency risk on a single market. esa.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: esa.int could expand into Canada, Australia, India, while livescience.com could target Italy, Germany, France.
Key Takeaways
- •livescience.com is losing traffic (-11%) despite 8.2M monthly visits. esa.int's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while livescience.com relies on Direct (37%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — esa.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while esa.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •livescience.com receives 3.8x more monthly traffic than esa.int (8.2M vs 2.1M).
- •esa.int is growing (+5%) while livescience.com is declining (-11%).
- •esa.int keeps visitors significantly longer (2m18s avg session vs livescience.com's 1m05s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •esa.int acquires traffic primarily through Search (43%), while livescience.com relies on Direct (37%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026