esa.int vs space.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| esa.int | space.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 11.4M | space.com |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 60.8% | esa.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y | 28y 6m | esa.int |
esa.int leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while space.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| esa.int | space.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 11.4M | space.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | +24% | space.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m18s | 1m06s | esa.int |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 1.6 | esa.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
space.com is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 2.1x shorter (1m06s vs 2m18s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| esa.int | space.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 43% | Search 42% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 60.8% | esa.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 22%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while space.com relies on Search (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — esa.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while esa.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| esa.int | space.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y | 28y 6m | esa.int |
| Registered | Aug 1996 | Feb 1998 | |
| Expires | — | Feb 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
esa.int has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| esa.int | space.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25.5K | #7.3K | space.com |
| Category Rank | #75 | #3 | space.com |
esa.int only
space.com only
Market Position · Insight
space.com is heavily concentrated in United States (59%), creating dependency risk on a single market. esa.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: esa.int could expand into Canada, China, India, while space.com could target Italy, Germany, France.
Key Takeaways
- •space.com is growing +24% while esa.int grows +5%. At current trajectory, space.com could close the traffic gap within 4 months.
- •space.com is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 2.1x shorter (1m06s vs 2m18s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while space.com relies on Search (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — esa.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while esa.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •space.com receives 5.3x more monthly traffic than esa.int (11.4M vs 2.1M).
- •Both are growing, with space.com accelerating faster at +24% vs +5%.
- •esa.int keeps visitors significantly longer (2m18s avg session vs space.com's 1m06s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026