esa.int vs planetary.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| esa.int | planetary.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 483.1K | esa.int |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 49.9% | planetary.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y | 31y 4m | planetary.org |
planetary.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while esa.int leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| esa.int | planetary.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 483.1K | esa.int |
| MoM Change | +5% | -11% | esa.int |
| Avg. Session | 2m18s | 0m44s | esa.int |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 1.7 | esa.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
planetary.org is losing traffic (-11%) despite 483.1K monthly visits. esa.int's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| esa.int | planetary.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 43% | Search 46% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 49.9% | planetary.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while planetary.org relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — planetary.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while planetary.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| esa.int | planetary.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y | 31y 4m | planetary.org |
| Registered | Aug 1996 | Apr 1995 | |
| Expires | — | Apr 2029 |
Business Maturity · Insight
planetary.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| esa.int | planetary.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25.5K | #124.3K | esa.int |
| Category Rank | #75 | #24 | planetary.org |
esa.int only
planetary.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: esa.int could expand into Canada, India, Australia, while planetary.org could target Italy, Germany, France.
Key Takeaways
- •planetary.org is losing traffic (-11%) despite 483.1K monthly visits. esa.int's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while planetary.org relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — planetary.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while planetary.org's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •esa.int receives 4.4x more monthly traffic than planetary.org (2.1M vs 483.1K).
- •esa.int is growing (+5%) while planetary.org is declining (-11%).
- •esa.int keeps visitors significantly longer (2m18s avg session vs planetary.org's 0m44s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 10 keywords (20% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026