esa.int vs nasa.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| esa.int | nasa.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 22.4M | nasa.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 51.8% | nasa.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y | 28y 11m | esa.int |
nasa.gov leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while esa.int leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| esa.int | nasa.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.1M | 22.4M | nasa.gov |
| MoM Change | +5% | +24% | nasa.gov |
| Avg. Session | 2m18s | 3m04s | nasa.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 8.2 | nasa.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
nasa.gov is growing +24% while esa.int grows +5%. At current trajectory, nasa.gov could close the traffic gap within 4 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| esa.int | nasa.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 43% | Search 46% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.9% | 51.8% | nasa.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 58%
| Keyword | Volume | esa.int | nasa.gov |
|---|---|---|---|
| hera | 199.2K | #7 | #10 |
| mir | 40.6K | #3 | #5 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while nasa.gov relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — esa.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while nasa.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| esa.int | nasa.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y | 28y 11m | esa.int |
| Registered | Aug 1996 | Oct 1997 | |
| Expires | — | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
esa.int has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| esa.int | nasa.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25.5K | #1.5K | nasa.gov |
| Category Rank | #75 | #3 | nasa.gov |
| PH Upvotes | — | 142 |
esa.int only
nasa.gov only
Market Position · Insight
nasa.gov is heavily concentrated in United States (48%), creating dependency risk on a single market. esa.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: esa.int could expand into India, Canada, while nasa.gov could target Italy, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •nasa.gov is growing +24% while esa.int grows +5%. At current trajectory, nasa.gov could close the traffic gap within 4 months.
- •esa.int acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while nasa.gov relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — esa.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while nasa.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •nasa.gov receives 10.5x more monthly traffic than esa.int (22.4M vs 2.1M).
- •Both are growing, with nasa.gov accelerating faster at +24% vs +5%.
- •They share 22 keywords (58% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •nasa.gov depends on a single country for 48% of traffic, while esa.int is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026