fbref.com vs theanalyst.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fbref.com | theanalyst.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.0M | 3.9M | theanalyst.com |
| Bounce Rate | 27.7% | 47.7% | fbref.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 17y | 28y 3m | theanalyst.com |
theanalyst.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while fbref.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fbref.com | theanalyst.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.0M | 3.9M | theanalyst.com |
| MoM Change | +19% | +10% | fbref.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m41s | 2m38s | fbref.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.1 | 2.9 | fbref.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
fbref.com is growing +19% while theanalyst.com grows +10%. At current trajectory, fbref.com could close the traffic gap within 5 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| fbref.com | theanalyst.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 76% | Search 60% | |
| Bounce Rate | 27.7% | 47.7% | fbref.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 11%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fbref.com acquires users primarily through Search (76%), while theanalyst.com relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — theanalyst.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fbref.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fbref.com | theanalyst.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 17y | 28y 3m | theanalyst.com |
| Registered | Aug 2009 | May 1998 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
theanalyst.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fbref.com | theanalyst.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #15.3K | #16.2K | fbref.com |
| Category Rank | #13 | #55 | fbref.com |
fbref.com only
theanalyst.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fbref.com could expand into Thailand, Germany, Vietnam, while theanalyst.com could target Canada, Spain, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •fbref.com is growing +19% while theanalyst.com grows +10%. At current trajectory, fbref.com could close the traffic gap within 5 months.
- •fbref.com acquires users primarily through Search (76%), while theanalyst.com relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — theanalyst.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fbref.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •theanalyst.com has 1.3x more traffic (3.9M vs 3.0M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •Both are growing, with fbref.com accelerating faster at +19% vs +10%.
- •fbref.com has a 20 percentage point lower bounce rate (28% vs 48%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 6 keywords (11% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026