hk01.com vs wired.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| hk01.com | wired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 36.7M | 13.9M | hk01.com |
| Bounce Rate | 42.3% | 62.9% | hk01.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 17y 7m | 33y 9m | wired.com |
hk01.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while wired.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| hk01.com | wired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 36.7M | 13.9M | hk01.com |
| MoM Change | +4% | +1% | hk01.com |
| Avg. Session | 10m45s | 0m52s | hk01.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.6 | 1.5 | hk01.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
hk01.com receives 2.6x more monthly traffic than wired.com (36.7M vs 13.9M).
Acquisition Strategy
| hk01.com | wired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 53% | Search 43% | |
| Bounce Rate | 42.3% | 62.9% | hk01.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 3%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
hk01.com acquires users primarily through Search (53%), while wired.com relies on Search (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — wired.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while hk01.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| hk01.com | wired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 17y 7m | 33y 9m | wired.com |
| Registered | Jan 2009 | Nov 1992 | |
| Expires | Jan 2029 | Nov 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
wired.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| hk01.com | wired.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #2.2K | #5.9K | hk01.com |
| Category Rank | #2 | #54 | hk01.com |
hk01.com only
wired.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: hk01.com could expand into United Kingdom, India, Australia, while wired.com could target Hong Kong SAR China, Taiwan, China.
Key Takeaways
- •hk01.com receives 2.6x more monthly traffic than wired.com (36.7M vs 13.9M).
- •hk01.com acquires users primarily through Search (53%), while wired.com relies on Search (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — wired.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while hk01.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •hk01.com receives 2.6x more monthly traffic than wired.com (36.7M vs 13.9M).
- •hk01.com keeps visitors significantly longer (10m45s avg session vs wired.com's 0m52s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •hk01.com has a 21 percentage point lower bounce rate (42% vs 63%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 3% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026