ip.me vs ipinfo.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| ip.me | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 747.7K | 2.3M | ipinfo.io |
| Bounce Rate | 50.7% | 51.9% | ip.me |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 17y 1m | 13y 4m | ip.me |
ip.me leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while ipinfo.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| ip.me | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 747.7K | 2.3M | ipinfo.io |
| MoM Change | +7% | -1% | ip.me |
| Avg. Session | 1m14s | 2m01s | ipinfo.io |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 2.5 | ipinfo.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
ipinfo.io is losing traffic (-1%) despite 2.3M monthly visits. ip.me's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| ip.me | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 50% | Direct 56% | |
| Bounce Rate | 50.7% | 51.9% | ip.me |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 400%
| Keyword | Volume | ip.me | ipinfo.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| ip | 922.2K | #1 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
ip.me acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while ipinfo.io relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ipinfo.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ip.me's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| ip.me | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 17y 1m | 13y 4m | ip.me |
| Registered | Jul 2009 | Apr 2013 | |
| Expires | Jul 2027 | Apr 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
ip.me has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| ip.me | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #83.8K | #26.9K | ipinfo.io |
| Category Rank | #1.4K | #112 | ipinfo.io |
ip.me only
ipinfo.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: ip.me could expand into Germany, India, Russia, while ipinfo.io could target Netherlands, Indonesia, Hong Kong SAR China.
Key Takeaways
- •ipinfo.io is losing traffic (-1%) despite 2.3M monthly visits. ip.me's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •ip.me acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while ipinfo.io relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ipinfo.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ip.me's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ipinfo.io receives 3.1x more monthly traffic than ip.me (2.3M vs 747.7K).
- •ip.me is growing (+7%) while ipinfo.io is declining (-1%).
- •ipinfo.io keeps visitors significantly longer (2m01s avg session vs ip.me's 1m14s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 48 keywords (400% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026