ipchicken.com vs ipinfo.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| ipchicken.com | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 478.3K | 2.3M | ipinfo.io |
| Bounce Rate | 59.5% | 51.9% | ipinfo.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 24y 8m | 13y 4m | ipchicken.com |
ipinfo.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while ipchicken.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| ipchicken.com | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 478.3K | 2.3M | ipinfo.io |
| MoM Change | +2% | -1% | ipchicken.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m54s | 2m01s | ipinfo.io |
| Pages / Visit | 1.5 | 2.5 | ipinfo.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
ipinfo.io is losing traffic (-1%) despite 2.3M monthly visits. ipchicken.com's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| ipchicken.com | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 51% | Direct 56% | |
| Bounce Rate | 59.5% | 51.9% | ipinfo.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 88%
| Keyword | Volume | ipchicken.com | ipinfo.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| ip | 922.2K | #5 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
ipchicken.com acquires users primarily through Direct (51%), while ipinfo.io relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ipinfo.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ipchicken.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| ipchicken.com | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 24y 8m | 13y 4m | ipchicken.com |
| Registered | Dec 2001 | Apr 2013 | |
| Expires | Dec 2026 | Apr 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
ipchicken.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| ipchicken.com | ipinfo.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #135.2K | #26.9K | ipinfo.io |
| Category Rank | #1.2K | #112 | ipinfo.io |
ipchicken.com only
ipinfo.io only
Market Position · Insight
ipchicken.com is heavily concentrated in United States (49%), creating dependency risk on a single market. ipinfo.io has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: ipchicken.com could expand into China, Germany, India, while ipinfo.io could target Philippines, Canada, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •ipinfo.io is losing traffic (-1%) despite 2.3M monthly visits. ipchicken.com's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •ipchicken.com acquires users primarily through Direct (51%), while ipinfo.io relies on Direct (56%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ipinfo.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ipchicken.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ipinfo.io receives 4.9x more monthly traffic than ipchicken.com (2.3M vs 478.3K).
- •ipchicken.com is growing (+2%) while ipinfo.io is declining (-1%).
- •ipinfo.io keeps visitors significantly longer (2m01s avg session vs ipchicken.com's 0m54s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 28 keywords (88% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026