jamanetwork.com vs who.int
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| jamanetwork.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.3M | 9.9M | who.int |
| Bounce Rate | 47.4% | 58.3% | jamanetwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 19y 3m | 28y 3m | who.int |
who.int leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while jamanetwork.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| jamanetwork.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.3M | 9.9M | who.int |
| MoM Change | +1% | -7% | jamanetwork.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m09s | 2m23s | who.int |
| Pages / Visit | 2.7 | 2.8 | who.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
who.int is losing traffic (-7%) despite 9.9M monthly visits. jamanetwork.com's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| jamanetwork.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 35% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.4% | 58.3% | jamanetwork.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
jamanetwork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (35%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — who.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while who.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| jamanetwork.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 19y 3m | 28y 3m | who.int |
| Registered | Jun 2007 | Jun 1998 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | — |
Business Maturity · Insight
who.int has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| jamanetwork.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #14.7K | #6.5K | who.int |
| Category Rank | #67 | #184 | jamanetwork.com |
jamanetwork.com only
who.int only
Market Position · Insight
jamanetwork.com is heavily concentrated in United States (58%), creating dependency risk on a single market. who.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: jamanetwork.com could expand into Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, while who.int could target Canada, Japan, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •who.int is losing traffic (-7%) despite 9.9M monthly visits. jamanetwork.com's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •jamanetwork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (35%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — who.int's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while who.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •who.int receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than jamanetwork.com (9.9M vs 4.3M).
- •jamanetwork.com is growing (+1%) while who.int is declining (-7%).
- •jamanetwork.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (47% vs 58%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •jamanetwork.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (35%), while who.int relies on Search (53%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026