livescience.com vs who.int
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| livescience.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.2M | 9.9M | who.int |
| Bounce Rate | 59.5% | 58.3% | who.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 25y 5m | 28y 3m | who.int |
who.int leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while livescience.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| livescience.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.2M | 9.9M | who.int |
| MoM Change | -11% | -7% | who.int |
| Avg. Session | 1m05s | 2m23s | who.int |
| Pages / Visit | 1.5 | 2.8 | who.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
who.int receives 1.2x more monthly traffic than livescience.com (9.9M vs 8.2M).
Acquisition Strategy
| livescience.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 37% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 59.5% | 58.3% | who.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
livescience.com acquires users primarily through Direct (37%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — livescience.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while who.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| livescience.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 25y 5m | 28y 3m | who.int |
| Registered | Apr 2001 | Jun 1998 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | — |
Business Maturity · Insight
who.int has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| livescience.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #10.1K | #6.5K | who.int |
| Category Rank | #8 | #184 | livescience.com |
livescience.com only
who.int only
Market Position · Insight
livescience.com is heavily concentrated in United States (63%), creating dependency risk on a single market. who.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: livescience.com could expand into Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, while who.int could target Canada, United Kingdom, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •who.int receives 1.2x more monthly traffic than livescience.com (9.9M vs 8.2M).
- •livescience.com acquires users primarily through Direct (37%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — livescience.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while who.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •who.int has 1.2x more traffic (9.9M vs 8.2M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •who.int keeps visitors significantly longer (2m23s avg session vs livescience.com's 1m05s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •livescience.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (37%), while who.int relies on Search (53%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026