sciencealert.com vs who.int
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| sciencealert.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 12.8M | 9.9M | sciencealert.com |
| Bounce Rate | 60.0% | 58.3% | who.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 22y | 28y 3m | who.int |
who.int leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while sciencealert.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| sciencealert.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 12.8M | 9.9M | sciencealert.com |
| MoM Change | -13% | -7% | who.int |
| Avg. Session | 0m56s | 2m23s | who.int |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 2.8 | who.int |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sciencealert.com receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than who.int (12.8M vs 9.9M).
Acquisition Strategy
| sciencealert.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 44% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 60.0% | 58.3% | who.int |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
sciencealert.com acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sciencealert.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while who.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| sciencealert.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 22y | 28y 3m | who.int |
| Registered | Aug 2004 | Jun 1998 | |
| Expires | Aug 2029 | — |
Business Maturity · Insight
who.int has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| sciencealert.com | who.int | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #6.3K | #6.5K | sciencealert.com |
| Category Rank | #85 | #184 | sciencealert.com |
sciencealert.com only
who.int only
Market Position · Insight
sciencealert.com is heavily concentrated in United States (72%), creating dependency risk on a single market. who.int has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: sciencealert.com could expand into Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, while who.int could target Canada, Australia, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •sciencealert.com receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than who.int (12.8M vs 9.9M).
- •sciencealert.com acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while who.int relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sciencealert.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while who.int's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sciencealert.com has 1.3x more traffic (12.8M vs 9.9M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •who.int keeps visitors significantly longer (2m23s avg session vs sciencealert.com's 0m56s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •sciencealert.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (44%), while who.int relies on Search (53%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 5% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026