utah.gov vs yale.edu
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| utah.gov | yale.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.3M | 7.8M | utah.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 34.5% | 49.4% | utah.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | — |
utah.gov leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while yale.edu leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| utah.gov | yale.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.3M | 7.8M | utah.gov |
| MoM Change | -6% | +13% | yale.edu |
| Avg. Session | 5m36s | 3m01s | utah.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 6.6 | 3.7 | utah.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
yale.edu is growing faster (+13%) but visitors stay 1.9x shorter (3m01s vs 5m36s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| utah.gov | yale.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 45% | Search 50% | |
| Bounce Rate | 34.5% | 49.4% | utah.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 22%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
utah.gov acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while yale.edu relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — utah.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while yale.edu's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| utah.gov | yale.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | — | |
| Registered | Oct 1997 | — | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | — |
Market Position
| utah.gov | yale.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #5.3K | #7.5K | utah.gov |
| Category Rank | #25 | #45 | utah.gov |
utah.gov only
yale.edu only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: utah.gov could expand into China, while yale.edu could target Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •utah.gov is losing traffic (-6%) despite 8.3M monthly visits. yale.edu's +13% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •yale.edu is growing faster (+13%) but visitors stay 1.9x shorter (3m01s vs 5m36s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •utah.gov acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while yale.edu relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — utah.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while yale.edu's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •yale.edu is growing (+13%) while utah.gov is declining (-6%).
- •utah.gov keeps visitors significantly longer (5m36s avg session vs yale.edu's 3m01s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •utah.gov has a 15 percentage point lower bounce rate (34% vs 49%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026