berkeley.edu vs ca.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| berkeley.edu | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 12.4M | 88.0M | ca.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 39.6% | 34.0% | ca.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | — | 28y 11m |
ca.gov leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while berkeley.edu leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| berkeley.edu | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 12.4M | 88.0M | ca.gov |
| MoM Change | +20% | +5% | berkeley.edu |
| Avg. Session | 5m26s | 6m58s | ca.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 5.5 | 7.5 | ca.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
berkeley.edu is growing faster (+20%) but visitors stay 1.3x shorter (5m26s vs 6m58s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| berkeley.edu | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 44% | Direct 44% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.6% | 34.0% | ca.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 11%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
berkeley.edu acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while ca.gov relies on Direct (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ca.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ca.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| berkeley.edu | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 28y 11m | |
| Registered | — | Oct 1997 | |
| Expires | — | Sep 2026 |
Market Position
| berkeley.edu | ca.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #4.1K | #326 | ca.gov |
| Category Rank | #9 | #1 | ca.gov |
berkeley.edu only
ca.gov only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: berkeley.edu could expand into Philippines, Mexico, while ca.gov could target Germany, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •ca.gov receives 7.1x more monthly traffic than berkeley.edu (88.0M vs 12.4M).
- •berkeley.edu is growing faster (+20%) but visitors stay 1.3x shorter (5m26s vs 6m58s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •berkeley.edu acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while ca.gov relies on Direct (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ca.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ca.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ca.gov receives 7.1x more monthly traffic than berkeley.edu (88.0M vs 12.4M).
- •Both are growing, with berkeley.edu accelerating faster at +20% vs +5%.
- •They share 6 keywords (11% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026