exrx.net vs muscleandstrength.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| exrx.net | muscleandstrength.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 595.2K | 3.8M | muscleandstrength.com |
| Bounce Rate | 45.2% | 44.6% | muscleandstrength.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 25y 2m | 20y 8m | exrx.net |
muscleandstrength.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while exrx.net leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| exrx.net | muscleandstrength.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 595.2K | 3.8M | muscleandstrength.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | +3% | exrx.net |
| Avg. Session | 1m38s | 3m17s | muscleandstrength.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 3.3 | exrx.net |
Growth Momentum · Insight
muscleandstrength.com receives 6.3x more monthly traffic than exrx.net (3.8M vs 595.2K).
Acquisition Strategy
| exrx.net | muscleandstrength.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 38% | Search 60% | |
| Bounce Rate | 45.2% | 44.6% | muscleandstrength.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 18%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
exrx.net acquires users primarily through Direct (38%), while muscleandstrength.com relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — exrx.net's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while muscleandstrength.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| exrx.net | muscleandstrength.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 25y 2m | 20y 8m | exrx.net |
| Registered | Jun 2001 | Jan 2006 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Jan 2031 |
Business Maturity · Insight
exrx.net has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| exrx.net | muscleandstrength.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #78.6K | #15.5K | muscleandstrength.com |
| Category Rank | #1.0K | #29 | muscleandstrength.com |
exrx.net only
muscleandstrength.com only
Market Position · Insight
muscleandstrength.com is heavily concentrated in United States (45%), creating dependency risk on a single market. exrx.net has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: exrx.net could expand into India, while muscleandstrength.com could target Netherlands.
Key Takeaways
- •muscleandstrength.com receives 6.3x more monthly traffic than exrx.net (3.8M vs 595.2K).
- •exrx.net acquires users primarily through Direct (38%), while muscleandstrength.com relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — exrx.net's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while muscleandstrength.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •muscleandstrength.com receives 6.3x more monthly traffic than exrx.net (3.8M vs 595.2K).
- •muscleandstrength.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m17s avg session vs exrx.net's 1m38s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •exrx.net acquires traffic primarily through Direct (38%), while muscleandstrength.com relies on Search (60%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 9 keywords (18% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026