fathom.ai vs fellow.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fathom.ai | fellow.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 907.0K | 158.4K | fathom.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 67.6% | 45.8% | fellow.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 30 | fellow.ai |
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 8y 8m | fellow.ai |
fellow.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while fathom.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fathom.ai | fellow.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 907.0K | 158.4K | fathom.ai |
| MoM Change | +3% | -7% | fathom.ai |
| Avg. Session | 0m50s | 0m31s | fathom.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 1.5 | 1.9 | fellow.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
fellow.ai is losing traffic (-7%) despite 158.4K monthly visits. fathom.ai's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| fathom.ai | fellow.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 48% | Search 50% | |
| Bounce Rate | 67.6% | 45.8% | fellow.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 30 | fellow.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 392%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fathom.ai acquires users primarily through Search (48%), while fellow.ai relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fathom.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fellow.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fathom.ai | fellow.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 8y 8m | fellow.ai |
| Registered | Dec 2017 | Dec 2017 | |
| Expires | Jan 2029 | Dec 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fellow.ai has been in the market 0 years longer (9y vs 9y). fellow.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while fathom.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| fathom.ai | fellow.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #77.3K | #285.8K | fathom.ai |
| Category Rank | #1.0K | #6.4K | fathom.ai |
| PH Upvotes | 581 | 275 | fathom.ai |
fathom.ai only
fellow.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fathom.ai could expand into Germany, while fellow.ai could target United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •fellow.ai is losing traffic (-7%) despite 158.4K monthly visits. fathom.ai's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •fathom.ai acquires users primarily through Search (48%), while fellow.ai relies on Search (50%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fathom.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fellow.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •fathom.ai receives 5.7x more monthly traffic than fellow.ai (907.0K vs 158.4K).
- •fathom.ai is growing (+3%) while fellow.ai is declining (-7%).
- •fathom.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (0m50s avg session vs fellow.ai's 0m31s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •fellow.ai has a 22 percentage point lower bounce rate (46% vs 68%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026