kompas.com vs sofascore.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| kompas.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 48.6M | 94.0M | sofascore.com |
| Bounce Rate | 59.2% | 51.5% | sofascore.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y 8m | 14y 3m | kompas.com |
sofascore.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while kompas.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| kompas.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 48.6M | 94.0M | sofascore.com |
| MoM Change | -8% | -13% | kompas.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m50s | 5m13s | sofascore.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.3 | 4.3 | sofascore.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sofascore.com receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than kompas.com (94.0M vs 48.6M).
Acquisition Strategy
| kompas.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | Direct 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 59.2% | 51.5% | sofascore.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
kompas.com acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while sofascore.com relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sofascore.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while kompas.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| kompas.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 8m | 14y 3m | kompas.com |
| Registered | Dec 1995 | May 2012 | |
| Expires | Dec 2031 | May 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
kompas.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| kompas.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.3K | #528 | sofascore.com |
| Category Rank | #3 | #5 | kompas.com |
kompas.com only
sofascore.com only
Market Position · Insight
kompas.com is heavily concentrated in Indonesia (94%), creating dependency risk on a single market. sofascore.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: kompas.com could expand into Brazil, United Kingdom, Italy, while sofascore.com could target Indonesia, Singapore, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •sofascore.com receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than kompas.com (94.0M vs 48.6M).
- •kompas.com acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while sofascore.com relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sofascore.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while kompas.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sofascore.com has 1.9x more traffic (94.0M vs 48.6M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •With only 5% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •kompas.com depends on a single country for 94% of traffic, while sofascore.com is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
- •kompas.com has a 16-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026