montana.edu vs msu.edu

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

montana.edu faviconmontana.edu
VS
msu.edu faviconmsu.edu
 montana.edumsu.eduLeads
Monthly Visits691.4K4.3Mmsu.edu
Bounce Rate40.6%43.4%montana.edu
SEO & Keywords3030Tie

montana.edu leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while msu.edu leads in 1.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
montana.edumsu.edu
 montana.edumsu.eduLeads
Monthly Visits691.4K4.3Mmsu.edu
MoM Change+1%+5%msu.edu
Avg. Session2m59s6m05smsu.edu
Pages / Visit3.97.2msu.edu

Growth Momentum · Insight

msu.edu receives 6.2x more monthly traffic than montana.edu (4.3M vs 691.4K).

Acquisition Strategy

 montana.edumsu.eduLeads
Primary ChannelSearch 52%Search 44%
Bounce Rate40.6%43.4%montana.edu
SEO & Keywords3030
montana.edu
Search 52%Direct 30%Social 3%Referral 13%Email 2%
msu.edu
Search 44%Direct 37%Social 4%Referral 11%Email 5%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
16
14
16
montana.edu OnlySharedmsu.edu Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

montana.edu acquires users primarily through Search (52%), while msu.edu relies on Search (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — msu.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while montana.edu's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Market Position

 montana.edumsu.eduLeads
Global Rank#67.7K#10.0Kmsu.edu
Category Rank#518#55msu.edu
montana.edumsu.edu
🇺🇸 United States
71%
87%
🇨🇦 Canada
4%
1%
🇮🇳 India
2%
1%
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
2%
1%

montana.edu only

🇧🇷 Brazil 1%

msu.edu only

🇦🇺 Australia 0%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: montana.edu could expand into Australia, while msu.edu could target Brazil.

Key Takeaways

  • msu.edu receives 6.2x more monthly traffic than montana.edu (4.3M vs 691.4K).
  • montana.edu acquires users primarily through Search (52%), while msu.edu relies on Search (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — msu.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while montana.edu's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • msu.edu receives 6.2x more monthly traffic than montana.edu (4.3M vs 691.4K).
  • msu.edu keeps visitors significantly longer (6m05s avg session vs montana.edu's 2m59s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
  • They share 14 keywords (30% overlap), indicating direct search competition.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026