newyorker.com vs rottentomatoes.com

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

newyorker.com faviconnewyorker.com
VS
rottentomatoes.com faviconrottentomatoes.com
 newyorker.comrottentomatoes.comLeads
Monthly Visits13.5M105.8Mrottentomatoes.com
Bounce Rate58.3%50.0%rottentomatoes.com
SEO & Keywords3030Tie
Domain Age32y 9m27y 3mnewyorker.com

rottentomatoes.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while newyorker.com leads in 1.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
newyorker.comrottentomatoes.com
 newyorker.comrottentomatoes.comLeads
Monthly Visits13.5M105.8Mrottentomatoes.com
MoM Change+7%+20%rottentomatoes.com
Avg. Session2m12s1m32snewyorker.com
Pages / Visit2.32.3rottentomatoes.com

Growth Momentum · Insight

rottentomatoes.com is growing faster (+20%) but visitors stay 1.4x shorter (1m32s vs 2m12s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.

Acquisition Strategy

 newyorker.comrottentomatoes.comLeads
Primary ChannelDirect 43%Search 69%
Bounce Rate58.3%50.0%rottentomatoes.com
SEO & Keywords3030
newyorker.com
Search 29%Direct 43%Social 10%Referral 8%Email 10%
rottentomatoes.com
Search 69%Direct 25%Social 2%Referral 3%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
22
8
22
newyorker.com OnlySharedrottentomatoes.com Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 15%

KeywordVolumenewyorker.comrottentomatoes.com
maestro143.7K#8#6

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

newyorker.com acquires users primarily through Direct (43%), while rottentomatoes.com relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — newyorker.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while rottentomatoes.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

 newyorker.comrottentomatoes.comLeads
Domain Age32y 9m27y 3mnewyorker.com
RegisteredNov 1993May 1999
ExpiresNov 2027May 2027

Business Maturity · Insight

newyorker.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.

Market Position

 newyorker.comrottentomatoes.comLeads
Global Rank#5.3K#471rottentomatoes.com
Category Rank#75#17rottentomatoes.com
newyorker.comrottentomatoes.com
🇺🇸 United States
76%
48%
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
4%
6%
🇨🇦 Canada
4%
6%
🇦🇺 Australia
2%
3%

newyorker.com only

🇩🇪 Germany 1%

rottentomatoes.com only

🇮🇳 India 4%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: newyorker.com could expand into India, while rottentomatoes.com could target Germany.

Key Takeaways

  • rottentomatoes.com is growing +20% while newyorker.com grows +7%. At current trajectory, rottentomatoes.com could close the traffic gap within 5 months.
  • rottentomatoes.com is growing faster (+20%) but visitors stay 1.4x shorter (1m32s vs 2m12s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
  • newyorker.com acquires users primarily through Direct (43%), while rottentomatoes.com relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — newyorker.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while rottentomatoes.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • rottentomatoes.com receives 7.8x more monthly traffic than newyorker.com (105.8M vs 13.5M).
  • Both are growing, with rottentomatoes.com accelerating faster at +20% vs +7%.
  • rottentomatoes.com has a 8 percentage point lower bounce rate (50% vs 58%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026