impress.co.jp vs itmedia.co.jp

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

impress.co.jp faviconimpress.co.jp
VS
itmedia.co.jp faviconitmedia.co.jp
 impress.co.jpitmedia.co.jpLeads
Monthly Visits39.4M89.8Mitmedia.co.jp
Bounce Rate60.0%61.9%impress.co.jp
SEO & Keywords3030Tie

impress.co.jp leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while itmedia.co.jp leads in 1.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
impress.co.jpitmedia.co.jp
 impress.co.jpitmedia.co.jpLeads
Monthly Visits39.4M89.8Mitmedia.co.jp
MoM Change-2%-13%impress.co.jp
Avg. Session1m33s1m34sitmedia.co.jp
Pages / Visit2.11.9impress.co.jp

Growth Momentum · Insight

itmedia.co.jp receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than impress.co.jp (89.8M vs 39.4M).

Acquisition Strategy

 impress.co.jpitmedia.co.jpLeads
Primary ChannelDirect 48%Direct 31%
Bounce Rate60.0%61.9%impress.co.jp
SEO & Keywords3030
impress.co.jp
Search 31%Direct 48%Social 6%Referral 14%
itmedia.co.jp
Search 18%Direct 31%Social 5%Referral 45%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
16
14
16
impress.co.jp OnlyShareditmedia.co.jp Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

impress.co.jp acquires users primarily through Direct (48%), while itmedia.co.jp relies on Direct (31%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — impress.co.jp's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while impress.co.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Market Position

 impress.co.jpitmedia.co.jpLeads
Global Rank#1.7K#665itmedia.co.jp
Category Rank#1#3impress.co.jp
impress.co.jpitmedia.co.jp
🇯🇵 Japan
97%
99%
🇺🇸 United States
1%
1%
🌐 Taiwan
0%
0%
🇰🇷 South Korea
0%
0%

impress.co.jp only

🌐 China 0%

itmedia.co.jp only

🇨🇦 Canada 0%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: impress.co.jp could expand into Canada, while itmedia.co.jp could target China.

Key Takeaways

  • itmedia.co.jp receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than impress.co.jp (89.8M vs 39.4M).
  • impress.co.jp acquires users primarily through Direct (48%), while itmedia.co.jp relies on Direct (31%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — impress.co.jp's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while impress.co.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • itmedia.co.jp receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than impress.co.jp (89.8M vs 39.4M).
  • impress.co.jp acquires traffic primarily through Direct (48%), while itmedia.co.jp relies on Referral (45%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
  • They share 14 keywords (30% overlap), indicating direct search competition.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026